Skip to main content

Effects of short-term preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine plus conventional treatment on delirium following cardiac surgery in patients with sleep disorders

Abstract

Study objectives

To assess whether preoperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) nasal drips combined with conventional treatment could mitigate the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD).

Design

A prospective randomised controlled study.

Setting

The cardiac surgery intensive care unit (CSICU) and patient hospitalisation ward at a university hospital.

Participants

A total of 100 patients (aged ≥60 years) undergoing cardiac surgery at a university hospital between 7 January 2022, and 30 November 2022 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study.

Interventions

Patients with sleep disorders (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ≥8) were divided into two groups: Group A (the placebo group, n=50), receiving a short-term preoperative placebo combined with conventional treatment and Group B (the DEX group, n=50), receiving short-term preoperative DEX combined with conventional treatment.

Measurements and results

The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) was used for POD assessment in the CSICU, while the CAM was employed to assess delirium in the patient ward. Group B demonstrated a reduced incidence of POD compared to Group A (12% vs. 30%, odds ratio: 0.318, 95% confidence interval: 0.112–0.905, p=0.027).

Conclusion

The combined treatment involving DEX demonstrated a decreased incidence of POD in elderly individuals with sleep disorders undergoing cardiac surgery compared to the placebo combination treatment.

Trial registration

URL: www.chictr.org.cn with registration number ChiCTR 2100043968, registered on 06/03/2021.

Introduction

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication following cardiac surgery, with reported incidences ranging from 14.1% to 53.3% (Enomoto et al. 2023; Nakamura et al. 2023). Typically occurring 1–7 days after surgery, various factors contribute to cognitive function impairment, including patient age (Xu et al. 2022), cerebral embolism (Stump et al. 1996), cardiopulmonary bypass (Puskas et al. 2011), inflammatory response (Hudetz et al. 2011), preoperative cognitive ability (Greene NH et al.2009), opioid use (Fong et al. 2006), and inhaled anaesthesia (Eckenhoff et al. 2004). Research indicates that preoperative anxiety (Tully et al. 2010; Wada et al. 2019) and sleep disturbances (Todd et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2020) are also risk factors for POD. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, particularly the a2A subtype mediating the hypnotic response in the locus coeruleus (Mizobe et al. 1996), has been applied in preoperative sedation (Zhang et al. 2021) and anxiolysis (Knaeps et al. 2023). Despite its known applications, there is limited literature on the short-term application of DEX nasal drip in patients with sleep disorders before surgery. Therefore, this study represents the initial endeavour to administer intranasal DEX to elderly patients with sleep disorders shortly before cardiac surgery. Eligible patients with sleep disorders scheduled for cardiac surgery were enrolled, receiving either DEX or a placebo nasal drip as an intervention before bedtime. The observation period in the special sleep treatment room (with first aid personnel and equipment) spanned from 9:30 pm to 6:30 am the following day. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effects of different intervention methods on the incidence of POD.

Methods

Patients

This study adhered to the principles outlined in the "Declaration of Helsinki" by the World Medical Congress and received approval from the Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials under the ethics number ChiECRCT20210592. Additionally, it obtained approval and was documented with the Scientific Research Management of the First Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry Centre at www.chictr.org.cn, with the registration number ChiCTR2100043968 (06/03/2021). All participants provided written informed consent before participating in the study.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who were aged between 60 and 75 years; (2) those classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade III–IV; (3) those scheduled for cardiac surgery, such as off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and valve or aortic root surgery, from 7 January 2022 to 30 November 2022; and (4) those with sleep disorders (defined as having a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI] score of ≥8). The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who had a baseline Mini-mental Status Examination (MMSE) score of ≤21 points; (2) those who declined or were unable to participate in the study, communicate, or speak; (3) those with hearing disorders; (4) those with sleep apnoea syndrome; and (5) those who had an ejection fraction of ≤50% after admission. Criteria for withdrawal and termination of the study included patients who (1) had a preoperative hospital stay of <6 days; (2) experienced third-degree atrioventricular block; (3) were allergic to DEX; (4) were lost to follow-up; and (5) had data analysis failure.

Study design

The flowchart representing the technical steps of the clinical research involving the patients is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The technical flowchart of the clinical research on patients. EF ejection fraction, DEX dexmedetomidine

Grouping methods and double-blind design

The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using computer-generated numbers to form Groups A and B. The group allocations were sealed within sequentially numbered opaque envelopes, and these envelopes remained sealed until the patients provided informed consent. The patient, outcome assessor, and anaesthesiologist were blinded to the group assignment.

Intervention methods

Patients received either DEX or saline nasal drip before bedtime for 6–8 days before the surgery, with a minimum of 1 day interval between each of the two or three interventions. The administration of the intranasal intervention was performed by either the sole anaesthetist or a clinically registered sedation doctor, directly supervised by the anaesthesiologist in the ward. The syringe used for administration comprised either 2 mL of normal saline or 0.3 µg/kg of DEX. Each syringe was used twice (1 mL for each nostril, administered 5 min apart). The patients were observed for 60 minutes, and if their Ramsay score was 5 points> Ramsay score ≥3 points (Kaur et al. 2016) and the bispectral index (BIS) was <70 (Kang et al. 2019) (indicating a sedation level comparable to natural sleep), the intervention was concluded. If not, an additional treatment dose was administered, and the patient was observed for another 60 min. No further treatment was administered after the third intervention, irrespective of the Ramsay score or the BIS. In terms of intranasal DEX dosage in adults, Yuen et al. (2007) reported DEX at doses of 1.0 and 1.5 µg/kg produced significant sedative effects compared to a placebo, causing reductions in blood pressure and heart rate (HR, p<0.05). Barends et al. (2020) used 0.5–2.0 μg/kg DEX nasal drips to achieve sedation. Even with the lowest dose (0.5 µg/kg DEX), the mean arterial pressure decreased by 30% for 5 min in 10% of patients. Our aim was to induce a state resembling “natural sleep” rather than general anaesthesia or deep sedation. The dose was titrated to improve the patient’s sleep while minimising the impact on circulation and avoiding respiratory depression. Standard anaesthesia procedures were implemented for all patients upon entering the operating room to mitigate the impact of the anaesthesia protocol on the study outcomes. Both groups received conventional treatment for sleep disorders, including the use of earplugs and maintaining a regular wake-sleep rhythm.

Standard anaesthetic protocols

Upon the patient’s entry into the operating room for cardiac surgery, monitoring was initiated for the HR, invasive arterial pressure, central venous pressure, electrocardiogram, pulse oxygen saturation, and BIS. Anaesthesia induction involved administering 0.2–0.3 mg/kg etomidate, 0.5–0.9 mg/kg rocuronium, and 1.0–1.5 μg/kg sufentanil to all patients. Mask-assisted breathing ventilation was employed for 2 min, ensuring adequate muscle relaxation. The insertion of a tracheal tube with an appropriate inner diameter was performed using a visual laryngoscope (Insight iS2 Shenzhen Sultan Said Khan Medical Technology Co., Ltd.) when the BIS was maintained between 40 and 60. A fibreoptic bronchoscope was used to position the tube tip 2–3 cm distal from the tracheal carina. Mechanical ventilation parameters were set as follows: tidal volume of 6–10 mL/kg, an adjustable breathing rate to maintain partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35–45 mmHg, and an inhalation:exhalation ratio of 1:2. Inhalation of 1–2% of sevoflurane was administered, with intravenous anaesthetics maintained at 4–8 mg/(kg·h) of propofol, 0.1–0.3 mg/(kg·h) of cisatracurium, and a single supplement of 20–100 μg of sufentanil as appropriate.

Definition of the outcome

The assessment of POD in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit (CSICU) was conducted every 12 h using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) (Guenther et al. 2010), while delirium assessment at the ward employed the CAM. POD evaluation was performed 1-5 days postoperatively. A singular researcher administered the CAM-ICU or CAM measurement. Given the variations in specificity and sensitivity, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, was concurrently used for delirium screening. The secondary outcomes in this study encompassed postintervention anxiety, postintervention clinical insomnia, mechanical ventilation duration exceeding 12 h, occurrences of myocardial infarction, stroke, CSICU stay, hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. Postintervention anxiety status was assessed a day before the surgery using the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Postintervention sleep status (clinical insomnia) was evaluated for sleep quality approximately a day before the operation based on the insomnia severity index. Mechanical ventilation duration exceeding 12 h was reported as the percentage of time spent on ventilation from CSICU admission to ventilator withdrawal. The CSICU stay duration was recorded in hours, while the hospital stay was recorded in days. In-hospital mortality was defined as the number of patients who died from admission to discharge divided by the total number of patients in the study group.

Calculation of sample size

In the pretrial phase, preoperative intervention with intranasal DEX drip resulted in a 10% incidence of POD, where one out of 10 patients exhibited this outcome. In contrast, recent studies (Enomoto et al. 2023; Nakamura et al. 2023) reported POD incidences ranging from 14.1% to 53.3%. Taking the median value of 33.7%, a two-tailed type I error rate of 5% and a test efficacy of 80% (α of 0.05 and β of 0.20) was assumed. Using Power Analysis Software 15, the sample size was calculated, indicating a requirement of 44 patients in each group. Considering a drop-out rate of approximately 10%, a sample size of 49 cases per group was suggested.

For continuous variables adhering to a normal distribution, the mean (standard deviation) was used for description. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were described as medians (interquartile ranges), while categorical variables were described as percentages. Between-group comparisons of continuous variables were compared using the independent sample t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables across different groups were compared using the chi-square test, and a two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Baseline variables influencing POD (p<0.05) were screened through a multivariate logistic regression model. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 22.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Baseline data and intraoperative parameters

Baseline data in both groups included age; body mass index; sex; baseline PSQI score; preintervention anxiety; preintervention clinical insomnia; ejection fraction; presence of hypertension, diabetes, anaemia, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI); and the surgery type. Intraoperative data comprised variables such as operation time, anaesthesia time, sufentanil dosage, and propofol dosage. MCI was identified in patients with MMSE scores between 21 and 26. Serious adverse events included conditions such as hypotension, cardiac arrest, and heavy bleeding. Serious hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure of ≤80 mmHg occurring on two or more occasions, regardless of vasoactive drug use. Heavy bleeding was characterised by a loss of at least 50% of blood volume at the end of the surgery (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of baseline and intraoperative data between the two groups

Multivariate logistic regression analysis

To identify the factors that influence POD, the model was deemed to be significant when p<0.05. The results of the logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative MCI, preoperative anxiety (SAS ≥55), and preoperative DEX intervention were the primary influencing factors (p<0.05, Table 2).

Table 2 Factors that may affect POD in the logistic regression analysis model

Effects of the two different intervention methods on clinical outcomes

Table 3 illustrates the effects of the DEX and placebo interventions on various outcomes.

Table 3 Comparison of different clinical outcomes between Group A and Group B

Compared to Group A, Group B exhibited a significantly lower incidence of POD (12.0% vs. 30.0%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.318, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.112–0.905, p=0.027). Furthermore, postintervention anxiety decreased in Group B compared to Group A (8.0% vs. 24.0%; p=0.029). Notably, the incidence of postintervention clinical insomnia in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A (10% vs. 26%; p=0.037).

Incidence of anxiety and clinical insomnia in the two groups before and after the interventions

After the intervention, there was a decrease in the incidence of anxiety in Group B (36% vs. 8%; p=0.001), whereas Group A did not exhibit a significant reduction (30% vs. 24%; p=0.499, Fig. 2A). This suggests that the combination of DEX with conventional treatment methods effectively decreased the occurrence of anxiety. In terms of sleep quality assessment, Group B demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of clinical insomnia (36% vs. 10%; p=0.002), while Group A did not show a significant decrease (32% vs. 26%; p=0.509, Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The incidence of pre-intervention and post-intervention anxiety (A) and clinical insomnia (B) in Group A and Group B. Each vertical bar is represented as n (%). ** p <0.01

Discussion

Previous studies (Yuen et al. 2007; Iirola et al. 2011) have demonstrated that intranasal DEX injection is an effective and well-tolerated option for mild sedation in patients, indicating an absolute bioavailability of approximately 65%. Additionally, intranasal DEX has been observed to induce sedation in elderly patients (age ≥65 years), although caution is advised regarding the occurrence of hypotension in this population (Barends et al. 2020). In the current study, it is postulated that DEX might emulate a state similar to “natural sleep” by modulating the endogenous nonrapid eye movement sleep pathway (Akeju et al. 2018).

In a prospective cohort study, Wada et al. (2019) used multivariate logistic regression to analyse 91 patients with POD, revealing that preoperative anxiety effectively predicted delirium episodes (OR: 4.370, 95% CI: 1.051–18.178, p=0.043). Therefore, compared to the placebo group, the incidence of POD in the DEX group in our study was significantly lower (12.0% vs. 30.0%, OR: 0.318, 95% CI: 0.112–0.905, p=0.027), potentially attributed to the lower incidence of postintervention anxiety in the DEX group compared to the placebo group (8% vs. 24%, p=0.029). The precise mechanism by which anxiety contributes to delirium remains unclear. It is hypothesised that the connection between anxiety and delirium might be associated with shared central neuroinflammatory pathways implicated in their development (Inouye et al. 2014; Vasunilashorm et al. 2015; Furtado and Katzman 2015; O’Donovan et al. 2010). Additionally, the lower incidence of POD in the DEX group compared to the placebo group (p=0.027) could be attributed to the reduced incidence of postintervention clinical insomnia in the DEX combination treatment group compared to the placebo combination treatment group (10% vs. 26%, p=0.037). A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of 1,238 citations revealed a significant association between sleep disturbance and POD (OR: 5.24, 95% CI: 3.61–7.60, p<0.001) (Fadayomi et al. 2018). The potential pathophysiological links between sleep disorders and delirium encompass neurotransmitter imbalances, deficiencies of certain substances such as vitamin D, and altered melatonin metabolism, resulting in diminished neuroprotection (Dessap et al. 2015; Campbell et al. 2019; Hshieh et al. 2008; Velayati et al. 2020).

Preoperative DEX intervention, preoperative anxiety, and preoperative MCI emerged as the primary influencing factors for POD (p<0.05, Table 2). These findings align with prior reports indicating that preoperative anxiety (Tully et al. 2010; Wada et al. 2019) and preoperative MCI (Wang et al. 2022) contribute to an increased POD incidence. Although the proportion of mechanical ventilation time exceeding 12 h in Group A was higher than that in Group B (82% vs. 80%), this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.799). Other indicators, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, the length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality, did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups.

Our study has several limitations. First, patients in the two intervention groups received additional conventional treatments for sleep disturbances. The non-uniformity in the effects of these conventional treatments on sleep disturbances might introduce a degree of variability that could affect the results. Second, POD was assessed in a 24-h postoperative evaluation period, which might be affected by the residual effects of intraoperative anaesthetics and medications administered during the CSICU stay. Third, the successful implementation of this study required a specific location, specialised monitoring equipment, and trained researchers. Therefore, the application of this clinical technique is limited to medical institutions with appropriate conditions, and widespread adoption in primary care settings might pose challenges.

Conclusion

In elderly patients with sleep disorders undergoing cardiac surgery, the use of preoperative intranasal DEX combined with conventional treatment could reduce the incidence of POD compared to the combination of a placebo with conventional treatment. Therefore, for eligible elderly individuals, the suggestion is to consider administering intranasal DEX combined with conventional treatment before surgery. As an avenue for future exploration, there is a need for cost-effective medications with fewer side effects to serve as alternatives to DEX to reduce the POD incidence among patients with sleep disorders, with a particular focus on their viability as nasal drops.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting this research can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BIS:

Bispectral index       

BMI:

Body mass index

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CAM-ICU:

Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit

CI:

Confidence interval

CSICU:

Cardiac surgery intensive care unit

DEX:

Dexmedetomidine

EF:

Ejection fraction

HR:

Heart rate

IQR:

Interquartile range

ISI:

Insomnia severity index

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

MMSE:

Mini-mental Status Examination

OR:

Odds ratio

POD:

Postoperative delirium

PSQI0 :

Baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

SAS:

Self-rating Anxiety Scale

References

  • Akeju O, Hobbs LE, Gao L, et al. Dexmedetomidine promotes biomimetic non-rapid eye movement stage 3 sleep in humans: a pilot study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;129:69–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barends CRM, Driesens MK, Struys MMRF, et al. Intranasal dexmedetomidine in elderly subjects with or without beta blockade: a randomised double-blind single-ascending-dose cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:411–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell AM, Axon DR, Martin JR, et al. Melatonin for the prevention of postoperative delirium in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dessap AM, Roche-Campo F, Launay JM, et al. Delirium and circadian rhythm of melatonin during weaning from mechanical ventilation: an ancillary study of a weaning trial. Chest. 2015;148:1231–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckenhoff RG, Johansson JS, Wei H, et al. Inhaled anesthetic enhancement of amyloid-β oligomerization and cytotoxicity. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:703–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enomoto K, Kosaka S, Kimura T, et al. Prevention of postoperative delirium after cardiovascular surgery: a team-based approach. J Thorac Cardiov Sur. 2023;165(5):1873-1881.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadayomi AB, Ibala R, Bilotta F, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the impact of sleep disturbance on postoperative delirium. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e1204-12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fong HK, Sands LP, Leung JM. The role of postoperative analgesia in delirium and cognitive decline in elderly patients: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(4):1255–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furtado M, Katzman MA. Neuroinflammatory pathways in anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and obsessive compulsive disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2015;229:37–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene NH, Attix DK, Weldon BC, et al. Measures of executive function and depression identify patients at risk for postoperative delirium. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(4):788–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther U, Popp J, Koecher L, et al. Validity and reliability of the CAM-ICU flowsheet to diagnose delirium in surgical ICU patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25:144–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hshieh TT, Fong TG, Marcantonio ER, et al. Cholinergic deficiency hypothesis in delirium: a synthesis of current evidence. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:764–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudetz JA, Gandhi SD, Iqbal Z, et al. Elevated postoperative inflammatory biomarkers are associated with short- and medium-term cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery surgery. J Anesth. 2011;25:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye SK, Westendorp RGJ, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383:911–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kang D, Lim C, Shim DJ, et al. The correlation of heart rate between natural sleep and dexmedetomidine sedation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(2):164–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur S, Gupta KK, Singh A, et al. Arousal from sedation in lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anesthesia: Comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10(1):98–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Knaeps D, Van de Putte P, Van de Velde M. Pharmacological strategies to reduce perioperative anxiety in children – a narrative review. Acta Anaesth Belg. 2023;74(3):195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lirola T, Vilo S, Manner T, et al. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(8):825–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizobe T, Maghsoudi K, Sitwala K, et al. Antisense technology reveals the alpha2- adrenoceptor to be the subtype mediating the hypnotic response to the highly selective agonist, dexmedetomidine, in the locus coeruleus of the rat. J Clin Investig. 1996;98:1076–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura R, Miyamoto K, Tsuji K, et al. The impact of a preoperative nurse-led orientation program on postoperative delirium after cardiovascular surgery: a retrospective single-center observational study. J Intensive Care. 2023;11(1):20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan A, Hughes BM, Slavich GM, et al. Clinical anxiety, cortisol and interleukin-6: evidence for specificity in emotion–biology relationships. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:1074–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Puskas JD, Stringer A, Hwang SN, et al. Neurocognitive and neuroanatomic changes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:1116–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stump DA, Rogers AT, Hammon JW, et al. Cerebral emboli and cognitive outcome after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:113–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd OM, Gelrich L, MacLullich AM, et al. Sleep disruption at home as an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65:949–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tully PJ, Baker RA, Winefield HR, et al. Depression, anxiety disorders and type D personality as risk factors for delirium after cardiac surgery. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010;44:1005–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasunilashorn SM, Ngo L, Inouye SK, et al. Cytokines and postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing major elective surgery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70:1289–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Velayati A, Vahdat Shariatpanahi M, Dehghan S, et al. Vitamin D and postoperative delirium after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective cohort study. J Cardiothor Vasc An. 2020;34(7):1774–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wada S, Inoguchi H, Sadahiro R, et al. Preoperative anxiety as a predictor of delirium in cancer patients: a prospective observational cohort study. World J Surg. 2019;43:134–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhang L, Luo Q, et al. Effect of sleep disorder on delirium in post-cardiac surgery patients. Can J Neurol Sci. 2020;47:627–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Mu C, Tang X, et al. The relationship between mild cognitive impairment and postoperative delirium undergoing total knee arthroplasty: the PNDABLE study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:959510.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Meng Y, Qian X, et al. Prediction model for delirium in patients with cardiovascular surgery: development and validation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;17(1):247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen VM, Irwin MG, Hui TW, et al. A double-blind, crossover assessment of the sedative and analgesic effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:374–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Chen Y, Li S, et al. The 90% effective dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation in children with congenital heart disease before and after surgery: a biased-coin design up-and-down sequential allocation trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021;65:188–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Dr. Yanhu Xie for his unwavering support of our research. Lastly, our appreciation extends to all the contributing authors who participated in this study.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This research was self-financed and did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JF and YX designed the research; QZ collected the data; JY analysed the data; MY Z and QZ collected the data; JF wrote the paper. MZ and YX contributed equally to this study and should be considered as co-corresponding authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Min Zhang or Yanhu Xie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study adhered to the “Declaration of Helsinki” as established by the World Medical Congress and was approved by the Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials (approval number: ChiECRCT20210592). This study was also approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China. All patients provided informed consent before participating in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, J., Yang, J., Zhai, M. et al. Effects of short-term preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine plus conventional treatment on delirium following cardiac surgery in patients with sleep disorders. Perioper Med 13, 17 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13741-024-00371-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13741-024-00371-1

Keywords